The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 09:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dire rat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional monster. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Not a very active user (talk) 08:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 08:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. KingofGangsters (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Extremely minor creature with no reliable secondary sources. The article on "Dire Animals" in D&D in general was deemed non-notable enough to be redirected, merged, and ultimately deleted over the years. One very specific example of the concept is definitely not notable on its own. Rorshacma (talk) 01:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.