Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana A
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of Mazinger characters. Spartaz Humbug! 17:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Diana A (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This does not establish notability independent of Mazinger Z through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Mazinger Z or delete. Either is acceptable. The article makes no claim to notability, and finding independent reliable sources to establish notability has proved difficult. If someone can find Japanese sources, then the article can be recreated, but it must satisfy the WP:GNG first. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:45, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Mazinger characters, the only thing you would be merging is unsourced info, does not help the main character page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to List of Mazinger characters per Knowledgekid87, no significant coverage from independent secondary sources, fails WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 20:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.