Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devils drop
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. LFaraone 02:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Devils drop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod - see article talk page. I cannot find any evidence for this place, let alone the extensive history given in the article. Fails WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability. The proposed film that the author mentions on the article talk page, and about which there are "rumours" according to the article, is Devils hill, which I have nominated in a separate AfD. Jll (talk) 21:56, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My searches yielded nothing even approaching substantial coverage in reliable sources, and very little about anything with this name in Bradford (various other places are also nicknamed Devil's Drop). Seems very much like this article was created in order to attempt to form a background story for Devils hill, a seemingly unnotable future film being discussed at another AfD. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 23:44, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Cannot find any substantiating mention outside of WP. I also note that the creator of both articles and one other significant contributor have only edited these two articles. ClaretAsh 00:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lack of third party sources, seems like it was created for the purpose of promoting the project(s)... Sergecross73 msg me 21:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This appears to be unreferenced WP:OR. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.