The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Devilbunnies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A completely made-up fictional element that has absolutely no notability. There are absolutely no reliable sources about this. As the whole topic was just made up by a usenet group, and never expanded to anything meaningful, WP:MADEUP also applies here. This article has somehow existed since 2004, and in that time, the subject in question has never managed to gain any notability. Rorshacma (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (article creator): yeah, I'm not going to contest this one. All I can say is, it seemed more notable to me at the time than it does now with the benefit of eight years' hindsight. (RIP Usenet.) --Calair (talk) 10:32, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Usenet and usenet culture seems to be very poorly documented. This particular aspect isn't completely unsourceable as this book seems to provide some coverage. But that is all I was able to come up with. -- Whpq (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the fictional "element" (for lack of a better word) fails WP:GNG, coverage in secondary sources is either referring to the group that created the fiction, or is to trivial to write a complete article.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:22, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.