The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denys Defrancesco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 12:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:PEOPLE. While prolific within his genre,[1] the individual has no coverage with which to properly source a BLP. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:44, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete no coverage [2]. LibStar (talk) 01:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.