The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 03:06, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Davies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor who basically has only small parts and that's it. Wgolf (talk) 01:42, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-Yes it says 2nd nomination but it should be mentioned that from what I can tell this is a different Dean Davies then the one that was deleted. Wgolf (talk) 01:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No indication he passes notability guidelines. Most of his work is so minor the characters are not given names.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:52, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - To Human Traffic. Carrite (talk) 17:37, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Dean M. Davies, only notable person of this name. This one doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 18:33, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.