The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Age of the Five. MBisanz ^talk 03:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dannyl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This character does not establish notability independent of Age of the Five through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 03:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• merge into an article on the fictional universe. We ned to try to get some decent general article out of these --as explained in detail above. Just deleting is not constructive. But this nomination doesn't fit the article -- there are no fictional plot details here at all. I wish they would be done itn so specificaway as to make it clear that the actual individual article has been read and considered. DGG (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• merge as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction)#Characters and also because "just deleting is not constructive", which TTN should keep in mind. Enough information has been lost and work wasted because of his crusade. Laurent paris (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• improve, merge, redirect. And fully agree with Laurent paris. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Jay32183 (talk) 23:04, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.