The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:26, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Lagrange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not seeing any indication that this player meets either WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG; no significant coverage outside of stats and hiring announcements as would be expected of a popular sport. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Sports, Rugby union, and France. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. There may be coverage in French sources that I'm not finding, but unless someone finds anything, delete. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Article and BEFORE showed nothing but promo, database, and routine sports news, nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  23:03, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.