The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daily Koshish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no citations, questionable notability and just lacks meat. Zero Serenity (talk) 13:37, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 21:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:54, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, reference for being a daily newspaper is added, daily print commercial newspapers are notable enough. --Soman (talk) 08:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NNEWSPAPER. Sole cited source does not ring the notability bell. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:00, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.