The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DVDx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage for this DVD ripper. SL93 (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Non-notable software. oyasumi (talk) 16:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I found at least three products under this name, with another one being possibly notable (though I'm not convinced enough event to post it to WP:AFC). There is so many DVD rippers out there, that I don't think this software has a chance to become notable one day — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I can find no reliable sources, and there is nothing to suggest that this is any more notable than all the other DVD ripping software. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 21:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.