The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged by someone else. . –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Storm Bijli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The storm does not warrant an article as of now, it has very little information, and is improperly titled Cyclonebiskit 02:35, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is an ongoing event and, at the moment, not newsworthy. Eddie.willers (talk) 02:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the seasonal page - As Cyclonebiskit says this Cyclone isnt worthy of an article yet - though if forecasting predictions come true then it will be and i think the article would be placed at Cyclone Bijli Jason Rees (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - "Very little information" and "improperly titled" are not valid reasons to delete an article; rather, these issues should be addressed through editing. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Just as user Jason Rees says, little information and improper title are no valid reasons to delete an article. These are what leads to article development later. And ...the first cyclonic storm in Northern India... seems to be quite an important article. Kind regards to all. Rehman (talk) 03:03, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That statement is not true actually. There have been countless storms in northern India, Bijli is just the first storm of the season, nothing special, it happens every year. Cyclonebiskit 03:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I said that, but no matter! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Although very short, Bijli will probably cause a lot of damage, put the majoredit template on until the storm dissipates. HurricaneSpin Talk My contributions 04:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Merge - Don't start articles on active storms without discussing them first. It hasn't even done anything. This shouldn't be considered for an article until reliable information comes out. Potapych (talk) 05:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - All off the content has been merged into Cyclone Bijli. Jason Rees (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.