The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW keep. BD2412 T 04:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Csabdi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. 48JCL TALK 21:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. 48JCL TALK 21:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. See the corresponding article in Hungarian at https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Csabdi for lots of content and references that clearly establish notability. All recognized populated places are notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• keep While I do have to wonder where the Hungarian WP material came from, it's clear that this is an established village with a documented history. Mangoe (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a village of 1,000 people is clearly notable. SportingFlyer T·C 04:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems to be a census settlement with a mayor. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, looks notable as a village per the population. Piscili (talk) 12:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.