The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Bandicoot Returns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As much as I love games, this one is "paused in development" for a lack of development team, and needs to be paused from having an article for a lack of notability at this stage. Sorry, just not notable as a stand alone mod at this time. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:33, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect into Crash Bandicoot (series) main article. - Jorgath (talk) 20:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I wouldn't suggest merging. This is an independent Mod, not an actual supported version. This is one guy's dream to make another "level", with no references, so nothing to merge and redirecting would be pointless since they are not remotely the same thing, same company, same anything. Dennis Brown (talk) 21:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete since this is a fan made game that was never even made. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Would be awesome if he could finish it though.--Lenticel ^(talk) 00:47, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable, unreleased/unfinised fan game. The only sources I could find that were reliable merely said the game existed, no actual real coverage. Sergecross73 msg me 17:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No reliable sourcing, not notable, and as noted by nominator, not even completed. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FANCRUFT. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 01:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's a Blatant hoax. No sources to support.--ETLamborghini (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.