The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG, no claims or evidence of notability under WP:MUSIC joe decker^{talk to me} 05:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Counterblast (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no coverage for this band. Fails WP:MUSIC. SL93 (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~ Per nom. Article does not assert any notability, whatsoever, and has no reliable sources to corroborate material used. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 05:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Google news search came up with a big fat zero. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I didn't get zero on Google web search, but the review was on the third page.Marikafragen (talk) 01:32, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not notable, doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. DocTree (talk) 05:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.