The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 16:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Suicide (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NMUSIC. Fact magazine doesn't appear to pass the bar for a reliable source, either. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Don't see how Fact fails. Article could do with a bit more though - David Gerard (talk) 00:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Significant coverage from two reliable sources plus more in GBooks from Trouser Press, Option, and one or two books - enough for an article although it could clearly use work. --Michig (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Fact and Factmag.com have been well-established, influential players in music for well over a decade. Their review płus AllMusic's satisfies WP:NALBUM. Newman is a reasonably significant artist, so more write-ups are clearly out there. SteveStrummer (talk) 06:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.