The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Performance Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable college football awards, main author has been found to be the founder of the awards. Lots of spam and promotion in the article, should see the version prior to when I removed 23,000 bytes worth of text. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:10, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:11, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Phony awards, whose creator claims to use "scientific methods" w/out ever explaining them anywhere on his website. Plus, they're virtually non-existent in college football media coverage. —bender235 (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable. This looks like the ONLY actual non-press release coverage of the awards. I with I could find an article debunking CFPA, so we could keep an article telling the world that they're a sham, but they seem so non-notable that no one but us has even looked into the matter! cmadler (talk) 17:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete apparently a confirmed sockpuppet created the page maliciously.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:50, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.