The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clay dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria - little used term for calcareous concretions. See Talk:Clay dog for details Incorrectly identified as a "clay formation" that has been "sculpted by river currents" Paul H. (talk) 02:11, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 August 28. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 02:25, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge and redirect as suggested on article talk page. · · · Peter Southwood ^(talk): 03:53, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Seems to have been redirected to a parent article by nominator Jumpytoo Talk 20:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.