The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Haddawy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable American businessman with no WP:SIGCOV to be found. JTtheOG (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, Technology, and United States of America. JTtheOG (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Crypto spam article. Nothing for notability, 40 under 40 isn't notable, nor does much of the rest help. No sourcing we can use, this is all I could find [1], a PR item. Oaktree b (talk) 22:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: California, Nevada, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - a made up in one day awards for up and coming but ultimately run of the mill business person. And no, Bloomberg doesn't add to notability. Bearian (talk) 05:46, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.