Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris C. Kemp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 00:34, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris C. Kemp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough for biography. User:Velvetsmog (talk) 07:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Senior corporate officer for at least two highly notable organizations. Ivanvector (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Chief Architect" isn't a senior corporate office of Classmates, Escapia isn't famous enough here in the Seattle tech community where I live to be of note, and the Wikipedia doesn't contain bios for other tech officers of the US government. I also find some edits highly suspect as they come from three sources, one of which is Chrisckemp. User:Velvetsmog (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - CIO of NASA. Bearian (talk) 23:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Kemp is not the CIO of NASA, he's the CIO of one research center that belongs to NASA; quite a large difference. COI concerns, sources only mention him in passing, not significant enough coverage. GlassCobra 22:52, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I think GlassCobra has this one right. Polarpanda (talk) 00:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Insufficient third-party sources. My personal opinion is that his position and accomplishments merit an article, but WP:BIO requires independent third-party coverage by reliable sources, and that simply does not exist for this person. We can't base an article on the sourcing currently available. It's a shame, and this is the second AfD in a row where I've had to say this, but it seems to me that our hands are tied. --JohnnyB256 (talk) 16:37, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per GlassCobra. Crafty (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.