Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chakandra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ashleyyoursmile! 14:32, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chakandra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:NOTDICTIONARY applicable. Written like primary school stuff, without any source, until I reverted. Its a small village and I m also inhabitant of same state. Not encyclopedic and fails Notability. Heba Aisha (talk) 10:32, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: No sources were found on doing WP:BEFORE. Fails GNG. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 12:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Probably keep — I assume this is the same place as the "Chakandara" listed in the Sheikhpura district census handbook here (p. 90). If so, then it passes WP:GEOLAND as a legally recognized populated place. I'm not 100% sure though. 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 05:15, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
keep I have added the source. [1] The Pincode of this place is 811304. Sonofstar (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
keep Available sources qualifies for GNG. Namkongville (talk) 06:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to be a recognised settlement. Passes WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.