The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:26, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ceorl (Middle-earth) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability requirements. No third-party sources discussing this character, that I could find. Mdwicker (talk) 22:59, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Mdwicker (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:14, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Minor fictional character, already has an entry at LOTR Wikia._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:46, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete With the only sourcing being to Tolkien's book itself, there is just no justification for this specific article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:42, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, unless he founded the RohEx courier company and/or Ceorl d'Alene. The article is a regurgitation of probably everything Tolkien ever wrote about this very minor character. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:50, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as cruft. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 13:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Cheb- hi bach If not kept, should be merged into some character list, as the French have done at fr:Liste des Hommes de la Terre du Milieu. We have List of Middle-earth characters, but this is simply a list of names, and hopefully some editor would like to spend, oh, say 200 hours, moving things around.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:55, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Piling on just to emphasize that, in addition to this clearly doesn't meet our notability guidelines, we do the searcher a better service by letting Google show them the LOTR wiki result. More of a WP:RFD sort of rationale, but worth echoing the above I feel. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.