The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Mangojuice^talk 16:00, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Centralia (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Album fails notability. Prod contested by Chubbles1212. I agree with him that record reviews of this album must exist, as it was released by Relapse; I also think that since the band is signed to Relapse, that's probably enough to establish the notability of the band. But, I've gathered in previous AfD discussions that album reviews are not sufficient to establish the notability of an album enough to fork the album out of a band article. Feel free to discuss. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:15, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yawn. I don't mean to be impolite, but I don't think it makes much difference whether an album is kept as a separate article or is merged into the main band article. I've seen it done both ways. Shalom ^Hello 21:43, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or Merge I see no need for this information to be deleted; if you feel really strongly about it, merge it back into the main page and redirect, but album track listings are certainly encyclopedic. Chubbles 01:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with the Car Bombe (presumably the group) article.--JForget 15:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per JForget. The Car Bomb (band) article could whatever extra information that may be out there. --Evb-wiki 14:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.