The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cashy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to determine notability. Seems to be a case of WP:TOOSOON Primefac (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The Spin reference in particular contains significant coverage. While I couldn't find other pieces that are as definitive, the attention this person has received at notable publications like The Fader [1], Complex [2], and The Source [3][4] is enough in my view to support an article.  Gongshow   talk 23:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The subject has notability from various reliable news outlets. 98.249.241.179 (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Musician has enough notability to have a Wikipedia article. Juice656 (talk) 16:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.