Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carla Hanson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Carla Hanson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable politician. Bedivere (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Oregon. Shellwood (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Is a politician in a recognised role, plus a source shows she has taken the role.[1]. -- StarryNightSky11 ☎ 21:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Why a regional leader of a political party is notable? She does not pass WP:NPOL, as she hasn't held any public office at the federal, state level. Bedivere (talk) 21:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: State party chairs are not inherently notable ex officio. The only WP:SIGCOV that I was able to find after a thorough search was this limited entry in a local newspaper, demonstrating a failure of WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 12:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 19:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Justification: state-level chair does not inherently pass WP:NPOL. There are no media coverage available except self-generated content (such as Facebook) which fails WP:RS. // MitYehor (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per @MitYehor. Local and otherwise non-notable politician, given the sources in the article, failing WP:NPOL. The article currently seems mostly puffery. _MB190417_ (talk) 13:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.