The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 04:47, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Underpants (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article fails Wikipedia:Verifiability, this article is unsourced and I can find no information anywhere regarding this film. Given the popularity of this series I would expect some talk, but all I could find was people talking about this Wikipedia article. The article was created by a very new editor, whose other edits were unsubstantiated speculation. Even IMDB does not have an article on this, and, given their very loose criteria for inclusion, I suspect this indicates that this film is not happening. Rje 17:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Speedy Delete - speculative, "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball". In the best case scenario a fan has gotten over-enthusiastic, in the worst case this is WP:Spam. The sooner Wikipedia gets rid of this, the better. Salt might be appropriate as well. HagenUK 20:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as far too speculative and unverified.-- danntm ^T _C 21:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. No context, no verifiability. Realkyhick 21:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Andy Saunders 21:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. I see no need to salt the article. It's only been deleted once before. -- Black Falcon 22:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.