The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Busfaloba Creek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO as an anemic stub for a non-notable location KidAd (talk) 00:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Knowing the word "Busfaloba" is of unknown Chickasaw origin is not information about the creek itself establishing notability. Reywas92^Talk 06:04, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Eminently non-notable save perhaps for a real estate agent promoting sales. Activist (talk) 06:34, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough coverage to justify a standalone article. I couldn't find any real estate-related coverage, however sites such as Zillow and Hometown Locator create automated entries for just about any location that shows up in the GNIS database. –dlthewave ☎ 16:38, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I think this should be deleted because it is very unsignificant and non-notable. There are almost no sources or mentions at all. Koridas (Speak) 00:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.