The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Boys (2013 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A film that does not seem to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Although the article seems to have a copious amount of sources and external links, looking through them reveals that none of them actually appear to be genuine coverage in reliable sources, being things like press releases, blogs, and non-notable websites. Pretty much the best coverage the film got was only in small, local and college periodicals. Searching for sources turned up no professional reviews or coverage in reliable sources that I could find. Rotten Tomatoes also does not list any reviews for the film. The film's only claim to notability appears to be winning minor prizes at largely non-notable film festivals. Please note that there was a more notable film with the same name (Buffalo Boys (2018 film)), but it is unrelated to this film. Rorshacma (talk) 08:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and New York. Rorshacma (talk) 08:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I did not find much information about this 2013 film. Some of the reviews in the article appear to be blogs, and the movie does not have wide coverage. I see that it won an award for Best Coming of Age Film at the 2013 Manhattan Film Festival. Also a write up in the Buffalo International Film Festival. A few other minor awards. I am not ready to make a determination as we do have some interviews, a review in the Spectrum (a student publication). Many of the links in the article are dead now, and some of the archives are dead. I will keep looking and I will nominate the film at ARS and see if editors are able to work on the article. Lightburst (talk) 23:56, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:09, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Film festival win might be notable. There's an Indonesian film with the same name from a few years later that has more coverage. Weak keep based on the festival award, but I can't find any coverage of it online (dead links as explained above). Oaktree b (talk) 16:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I will boldly put this out of its misery. Not every film ever made is notable. Franky, this is a minor film with very little attention given to it. -- GreenC 16:58, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree with GreenC, not every film ever created is notable.`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 03:31, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.