The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sarah Strohmeyer#Bubbles Yablonsky Series. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bubbles Yablonsky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:GNG. I do not believe there is enough coverage from reliable, third-party sources to support this character having a separate article. Aoba47 (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 21:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• redirect to Sarah Strohmeyer#Bubbles Yablonsky Series as the search term is plausible, but there's so sign that I can see of the character's or series's independent notability. Mangoe (talk) 22:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect agree with Mangoe. Fails GNG. ^{cinco de} L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 01:59, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Since this character could be redirected and merged to Sarah Strohmeyer#Bubbles Yablonsky Series, deletion would violate ATD, PRESERVE and R. No comment on notability at this time. James500 (talk) 03:11, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Understandable. I understand a redirect, but I do not think there is anything that should kept with a merge as none of the information is sourced by a third-party, reliable source. Aoba47 (talk) 19:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Refocus into a standalone article about the series, rather than the character. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Headbomb: As long as you can prove that the series itself is notable enough through citing articles that cover it, then I think that this can be viable option. Aoba47 (talk) 17:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Sarah Strohmeyer#Bubbles Yablonsky Series. \\\Septrillion:- ~~‭~~10^Eleventeen 20:11, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.