The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bristol University Select (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Rugby union/Notability I don't think this club meets the criteria and I can't find enough reliable third party sources to show this meets WP:GNG — Rod ^talk 19:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. NN. Barely worth my delete vote. 17 edits since its creation 4 years ago. Surprised there are that many edits. Szzuk (talk) 21:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obviously NN. It is not a professional Rugby Club; not even a club. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.