Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian White (soccer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draft. Otherwise NC based on assertions and the proposals to draftify show a detailed appreciation of the SNG and sourcing. Spartaz Humbug! 15:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brian White (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concern was that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested by another user, stating that GNG is met, but the coverage appears to be routine. – Michael (talk) 07:02, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 07:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Despite the large number of people offering opinions, they're all just assertions that this guy does or does not meet WP:SOMERANDOMSTANDARD and/or the sources are or are not sufficient. I don't see a single real analysis of specific sources, so I'm going to throw this back onto the heap for another week. It would be really helpful to whoever closes this in a week's time to have some opinions on why specific sources do or do not meet our requirements.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 20:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.