The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Baker (diplomat) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. No significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 02:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment As the page has no references, there is no sign of notability, and yet in my experience most Canadian ambassadors do prove to be notable, when someone takes the time to dig out the sources. On LibStar's user page we can see a strange obsession with getting biographies of ambassadors deleted, but I am not seeing any involvement with this page, such as a challenge to add citations, or any sign of efforts to improve the page, or any of the others. They are all just drive-by Afds and are not the best way to deal with under-referenced articles. Moonraker (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:ADHOM LibStar (talk) 08:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Editors shouldn't go on a spree of creating unreferenced stubs and never touching them again. LibStar (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations and Denmark. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's also an unreferenced stub for 15 years. LibStar (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough sourcing to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:09, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.