The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boys II Men (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album has no claims of notability. Fails WP:NALBUMS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Hit #40 in Sweden and has been reviewed by dagensskiva.com (I have no idea how reliable the source is). Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Hit #40 in Sweden, obviously notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:49, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Here's another ref [1] (translation here [2]) that claims the album "broke new ground for Swedish hip hop by bringing in influences from electronic dance music from around the world." Robman94 (talk) 17:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.