The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. clpo13_(talk) 22:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Boost (chocolate bar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding much coverage via web search. It's difficult because this product isn't commonly present in my local markets, but this looks like it may not be notable? —valereee (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. —valereee (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - this is a notable chocolate bar (admittedly, not one that I particularly like, but that's besides the point). Despite "boost" being a fairly broad term, there are many hits on google books as well as on normal web searches. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Certainly highly notable in the UK. Plenty of sourcing. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. One of Cadbury's core chocolate bars in the UK, and found most places that chocolate is sold. I tried to clean up the convoluted history a bit and add some more sources. the wub "?!" 01:24, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - good work, The Wub. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artw (talk • contribs) 02:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:GNG, especially with the additional sources added recently. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable. --Devokewater ^(talk) 13:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, as it clearly passes GNGJackattack1597 (talk) 18:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.