The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 17:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boobs on Bikes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Barely disguised promo for a minor non-notable event. Biker Biker (talk) 08:12, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article needs a tidy-up and de-spam but the event itself is notable (obnoxious, but notable) and the article cites sources. Daveosaurus (talk) 10:21, 31 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep Unfortunately, as odious as it is, it is probably notable. Needs a major cleanup to remove the self-promotional dross. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 10:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, this article meets the WP:GNG, for example 110 exact matches on the NZ Herald website[1]. I disagree with the nominator's rationale, most of the content details opposition to the event, and besides tone isn't a reason to delete. XLerate (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep, a required cleanup notwithstanding, the article is clearly notable. Schwede66 16:22, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep, was extensively discussed in the media, and the article is about a series of major events with many, many thousands of spectators. Nonwithstanding any problems with the article quality itself, the topic is clearly notable. And because some people already felt the need to add their moral judgement into the debate, I will for my part go on record that I do not think there is anything "obnoxious" or "odious" about bared breasts and scantily clad men, even in the promotion of commercial pornography. Ingolfson (talk) 07:24, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, AFD is not for cleanup. — Cirt (talk) 05:09, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a pornographer trolling conservative portions of the media for puritanical coverage of his sales event is not notable, even when some of them rise to the bait. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP notability guidelines are not that prescriptive and WP is not censored. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The event that is promoted it not very notable but the promotional Boob on Bikes itself is very notable. I will go on the record as being so damned liberal that it not only makes me blush but I am making that libertine Marquis de Sade turn in his grave!! -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:02, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.