Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombadil Publishing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Bombadil Publishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable publishing company Blowdart | talk 12:09, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Some coverage of this publisher in news sources: [1] [2] JulesH (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Those would appear to be copies of press releases, as would the rest of the sources found by a Google News archive search except possibly for this one, which is only a brief mention. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Only 13 books so far, at least according to the website. DGG (talk) 19:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Last time I checked WP:BIGNUMBER and WP:SMALLNUMBER were irrelevant to policy. Rather than arbitrarily cutting things off based on a number, we should look at coverage of the company and which books they released. - Mgm|(talk) 09:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If this publisher is notable, it's more for their charity work than for the books they've published. JulesH (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.