The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boid for Android (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not appear to pass WP:GNG and none of the text indicates factors that would connotation more obvious notability. It has been tagged as needing this addressed for a while and it has not been worked on. LauraHale (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It's got a bit of coverage[1][2][3] but still seems to be pre-release (version number <1.0) and only for Android 4.0 which isn't widely used yet. Maybe a case of premature article creation - might be better to userfy/incubate. --Colapeninsula (talk) 08:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  —HueSatLum 16:01, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.