The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 18:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bo Thidé (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have some doubts about notability, since the statements in the article are largely unsourced (for instance, it says that he won the Edlund Prize, but I didn't find any RS for that). HPfan4 (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 July 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Sweden. Shellwood (talk) 17:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I've spent some time going through Swedish newspapers, and I think there's enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Edlundska priset is mentioned by his employer (Uppsala University) in one publication, but not something I'd build an article on – I figure that probably means he was awarded it, at the very least. /Julle (talk) 21:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Very substantial citation record passes WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep several major national newspapers have repeteadly sought out Thidé to solicit comments on physics discoveries, but the only in depth coverage I've encountered were in local papers. I'm not wholly convinced with respect to GNG. However, there's a healthy number of citations and he has published in both Nature Physics and Physical Review Letters (C1). Draken Bowser (talk) 21:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per coverage and citations. Passes WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 12:48, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.