The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 00:22, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blind Devotion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article for new EP that doesn't pass criteria for music. Currently only links for purchasing the music (iTunes, Amazon) or similar links can be found. Dennis Brown (talk) 17:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, per WP:Music. After a quick search, the only potential RS I spotted online was a Birmingham Mail article already used as a source for the entry covering the band itself. This album is mentioned there, which seems like sufficient coverage in the absence of further sources. --DGaw (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I felt there was too much information here to easily incorporate it in the Love Fungus article. That this release seems to be digital only at the moment is not an issue - look at Category:iTunes-exclusive releases for example. memphisto 13:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I understand what you are saying, but WP:WAX (part of the "Arguments to avoid") explains why it doesn't matter what other articles are doing. Right now, aside from track info, the totality of the article is: Blind Devotion is the debut EP from Love Fungus and was released in 2011.. All other info is already in the band's article. Track info isn't really needed (or can be a collapsed section if you must) if the EP isn't notable as a stand alone article, which is the issue here. Dennis Brown (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Beyond the aforementioned Birmingham Mail article (which contains only a passing mention for this EP), I'm not finding any significant coverage for this release; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS at this time.  Gongshow ^Talk 22:58, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.