The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. An error appears to have occurred in which the incorrect article was nominated, per the nominator's withdrawing statement. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:13, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Addendum: struck part of this closure above per information received on my talk page from the nominator, which stated that the nomination was withdrawn due to significant improvements to the article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:07, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big.LITTLE (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as there are no independent sources available. The Banner _talk 20:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:03, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I see independent sources. —Ruud 19:14, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Ruud. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Amazing! This is a completely other article then I nominated. So I have just one option left: Request speedy close as keep The Banner _talk 21:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.