The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bert Tatham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this is due for another round of consideration. In my view, this is a WP:BLP1E. If it wasn't for his arrest, he would never come close to notability. The problem with articles about people only known for one event is that the article gives undue weight to that one event. When that one event is negative, the article essentially becomes an entirely negative portrayal of its subject. I'm not wedded to a delete outcome here - I find BLP1E a very difficult test to judge. But I don't think the last deletion discussion was particularly well-considered and it is a genuine BLP issue. Note I've notified all the previous AfD participants and the BLP noticeboard. Mkativerata (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, WP:BLP1E does indeed seem to be the case here. Guy (Help!) 09:51, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Really about one event, not the person. However, I did not find it so negative and it might be helpful to the person to have his side of the case presented. But still doesn't pass WP:Notable.Borock (talk) 10:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable enough to overcome the BLP1E issue.--Scott Mac (Doc) 17:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Classic BLP1E. Aditya Ex Machina 14:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - clearly covered by BLP1E. ukexpat (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.