The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Relist at Proposed mergers. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 22:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BBC One 'Balloon' idents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved from 27th December, to sit with the rest of the set Jheald (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The content of this article could be condensed into a paragraph within BBC One. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 21:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• There is a family of these, what do you want to do with History of BBC television idents and the other idents? Polarpanda (talk) 21:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I have listed the articles separately so they can each be judged on their own merits. I think History of BBC television idents should stay and have content added to it. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 01:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as separate article, don't merge. For similar reasons to those already expressed in existing discussions at Talk:History of BBC television idents, if anything a more natural merge target, where consensus has already rejected merger. The content in this article is of value, and should not be lost to Wikipedia. The subject deserves (and gets) a short summary in BBC One and in History of BBC television idents, but the more complete discussion we currently give sits better in its own article. Jheald (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WT:BBC notified of this and immediately following discussions. Jheald (talk) 12:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge in History of BBC television idents. This isn't about deleting content but creating more of a relevant summary. Wikiwoohoo (talk) 18:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.