Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armita Abbasi (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Three AFDs in 2 months? I've never seen such persistence to delete an article where there is a clear consensus is to Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Armita Abbasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not meet GNG or WP:VICTIM; WP:1E applies. // Timothy :: talk 02:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I nominated this article for deletion (its 2nd nomination) a little over 3 weeks ago. The consensus was to Keep, with only one Delete !vote. Mooonswimmer 03:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't understand why this article could be nominated again for deletion 16 days after the closing admin (@User:Liz) closed it with the comment
I hope to not see this article nominated for a third round at AFD for at least a year.
. Even that second nomination was made only 24 days after the first one. Both prior nominations discussed and the issue of WP:BLP1E and consensus seemed clear. Does this mean that the nominator doesn't respect the consensus reached or does it mean that the nominator didn't read previous discussions before making this one, or is there another explanation about why we need to discussion this again? CT55555(talk) 03:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC) - Keep - per history of AfD. Clearly meets GNG. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Iran. Shellwood (talk) 08:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Procedural keep per comments above Mujinga (talk) 09:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Procedural keep given the closing admin's comments when closing the second AfD on 7th January. The rationale in this renomination gives no reason to set that conclusion aside (and if there was, WP:DRV shouldbe the venue). AllyD (talk) 09:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per second AfD results. Fad Ariff (talk) 13:04, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Procedural keep due to consensus reached at previous and recent discussions. CT55555(talk) 14:25, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Do not delete this page. Doing so would silence the voice of Iranian women. This is a factual account of a strong and brave young woman who has been through hell at the hands of perverted security forces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:14BA:21E4:3600:FC5C:2DD3:1E6:FFA2 (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.