The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture Discipline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a number of very minor awards "felicitation"s -- no major ings pp no indepth coverage for either their architecture or their design. DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I think this barely qualifies to be notable.--Blurz (talk) 02:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep received few notable awards from Government of India. Passes GNG. Priyanjali singh (talk) 13:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• felicotations is a mention, not an award. DGG ( talk ) 07:08, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is WP:NCORP and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:44, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:GNG - even if everything is true, they are a partnership with one notable commission. Bearian (talk) 20:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.