The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Jack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable, unsourced article. RF23 (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: as utterly non-notable. Quis separabit? 15:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for now as there's simply not much for a better article yet and I only found few links at Books, browser and Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 05:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom and above editors. Can't find enough to show it meets notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.