The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 04:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Taramaschi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

wrestler with very low notability, very few bouts. references do not support his having an article, are all basically tangential. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:18, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:19, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and there's not even any mention of him on wrestling databases like cagematch and wrestlingdata. starship.paint ~ regal 04:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unsourced biography with no indication of notability.Mdtemp (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete At first glance, I thought this article was a hoax. On second glance (at the image provided), it appears the article's subject is an ancestor of the article's creator. Whatever the case, the subject fails WP:BIO ("A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."). ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sounds like an interesting character, unfortunately fails GNG.LM2000 (talk) 04:29, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.