The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Jick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can a team's Public address announcer be notable? o apparent non--local coverage DGG ( talk ) 04:14, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Has enough WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:GNG. Anyone can be notable as long there is enough significant coverage on him. There is plenty of coverage on Jick in several publications [1][2][3][4] Alvaldi (talk) 09:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep I'd expect an article with more meat on it, but I guess it's notable, based on what we see as sources. Oaktree b (talk) 23:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:03, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep based on WP:SIGCOV provided by User:Alvaldi. Frank Anchor 12:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.