Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Haugen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 20:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Andrea Haugen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsourced/poorly sourced, possible wp:COI (VRTS ticket # 2008110110022181). Prod removed without adding inline cites to published, reliable, third party sources. -- Jeandré, 2008-11-02t22:00z 22:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have put in the correct sources! They are from her present biography. webbworks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatfan (talk • contribs) 01:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No you didn't - there still aren't any "inline cites", and personal homepages and myspace are not "published, reliable, third party sources". -- Jeandré, 2008-11-03t11:56z
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added two inline citations. I would ask the article's author(s) to please look at how I did this (they tried but didn't format properly, it has nothing to with a template) and to add citations for other material in the article. This is an encyclopedia based on news media coverage, it's not meant serve as an advert for the artist or a fan page. Please try to fix the article accordingly. That being said, this artist is notable and has substantial media coverage. The article's authors may need help in how to make the content encyclopedic. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wp:rs issues that don't establish wp:n. Lots of peacock terms and OR to boot. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 02:43, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, per WP:MUSIC: Members of two notable bands are genreally notable. Not only that, one of the bands is her solo project, which has released albums on the two notable indie labels Candlelight Records and Black Lotus Records (WP:MUSIC#C5). There also are some reliable sources outhere. I found two interviews which seem to be reliable, and there's the magazine that is mentioned in the article.
There's also the band Hagalaz' Runedance which redirects to her at the moment, but is notable in itself per WP:MUSIC#C5: They produced a number of CDs, among them two albums on the notable indie lable Hammerheart Records, and some of them allegedly charted, although I find no reliable source for that, I'm unsure where one can effectively search German album charts.
AmaltheaTalk 11:12, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply] - Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.