The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

American Falangist Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct party with no elected officers and no electoral success. Does not appear to have any significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Toa Nidhiki05 14:54, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Seems to have had quite a bit of coverage in books, if not on online news sites. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] AlessandroTiandelli333 (talk) 16:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Your first source is not about the American Falangist Party, but is talking about the unaffiliated Christian Falangist Party of America. The one relevant sentence states "The party is also not affiliated with the American Falangist Party in California".
• Your second source is from a self-published book (through Lulu.com).
• Your third source appears to be primary documents from an author that may not be independent from the subject of the article.
• Your fourth source is the same link as the third, so the same concern applies.
• Your fifth source doesn't discuss the American Falangist Party at all, only mentioning their website in a reference the author consulted. The book is also self-published.
• I am unable to tell if your sixth source mentioned the American Falangist Party at all, and if it did, it was only once.

MarkZusab (talk) 22:12, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete In addition to the inadequate sources found by User:AlessandroTiandelli333, I see this parted listed in a list of parties that have never fielded or endorsed a candidate [7], and discussed [8] in the context of its use of the Roman salute in books published by university presses. A piddling 3 hits in a Proquest news search, the best of which is a mention by a columnist: Democracy shines in a nation that loves a good party, or many, Newton, Ken. St. Joseph News - Press; St. Joseph, Mo. [St. Joseph, Mo]13 Oct 2002: n/a.] "Some parties you expect to have as part of the American political picture, with names like the American Liberal Party, the American Nazi Party, the American Reform Party and the American Falangist Party, the latter giving itself to fascist dogma and the hatred of Muslims and gays." this last is as close as I can find to anything resembline SIGCOV. It's not enough.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"

• Delete Lack of substantive sources or evidence this is an actual party that has ever actually done anything. Reywas92^Talk 07:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.