The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As mentioned by Coolabahapple and North America, meets WP:GEOLAND notability guideline.. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aman Magan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough notability, and makes no such claim. Jtrrs0 (talk) 04:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Possibly Keep – Appears to meet WP:GEOLAND as a populated, legally recognized place, as per the Census of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 1385 (2006) source in the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:32, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND, as a populated place, clicking on the coordinates takes you to a village on gmaps. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.