Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha Helix Process
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 19:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Alpha Helix Process (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable business process. This article, and the company's own website, appear to be the only mentions of this process to be found. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:46, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not close to passing WP:GNG, even if it sounds cool. Let it WP:SNOW. Deadbeef 21:28, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 00:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article was created in a cluster with others about the consulting firm (now deleted) whose "new project management model" this is. I have found no evidence that the model has achieved notability. AllyD (talk)
- Strong Delete nothing in gnews. fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 07:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.